I really do think the extended metaphor of “voices in a conversation” applies to finding another source related to our topic. Let’s say you were interested in researching and writing

I really do  think the extended metaphor of “voices in a conversation” applies to  finding another source related to our topic. Let’s say you were  interested in researching and writing about the effects of World War II  on Corvallis, Oregon (a suitably narrow, specific, and not over-studied  topic, and thus a good one for our project!). One way of finding another  source, perhaps, would simply be to type some search terms in google,  or in the 1search bar at the OSU Library website. In other words, you  could just do the search all over again. But, another, and perhaps a  smarter way to find another “voice in the conversation” would be to  which voices that source is responding. I recommend checking out the  references within the source you analyzed for Rhetorical Research 1. Who  does that source mention? Who does that source cite? There are related  sources right there! (On the other hand, Google Scholar allows you to  see a list of works that have cited a source since it was published. So,  for instance, if I could find “The Effects of World War Two on  Corvallis, Oregon” by H.G. Egglestein on Google Scholar—an entirely  made-up source, by the way—it would generate a list of sources that have  cited, and as such, to that initial source. At the start of your research into your Informed Rhetorical Argument  topic, you will write a rhetorical description of an argument that  interests you. Write a brief, 1-2 page (2 pages ), double spaced, 12 point font, rhetorical description of a source that interests you. You should try to find a source that is on the topic/issue which you will pursue for the next seven week. This assignment essentially has steps. Begin with an MLA formatted Works Cited entry for your source Write paragraph which  meets the criteria for Rhetorical Precis. The short length and  fill-in-the-blank nature of a précis can be misleading, but don’t be  fooled: it requires time, careful reading, careful thinking, and careful  revising to compose one of these successfully. This paragraph should . Write paragraphs  which evaluate the effectiveness of the author’s use of the rhetorical  appeals of ethos, logos, pathos and kairos. Would this argument be  compelling/convincing for the intended audience? If yes, what appeals  are functioning most prominently? If not, which appeals are falling  short of their aim? Root your analysis in SPECIFIC moments from your  article, using direct quotations and references as appropriate. Make  sure you link your evaluations explicitly to the rhetorical appeals  which they involve. FORM: download the and  fill in the bracketed, highlighted sections as appropriate. When you  insert the appropriate information, make sure to remove the  brackets and highlighting. EXPECTATIONS: You will be evaluated on whether or not your Works  Cited citation is formatted properly in MLA format. You will be  evaluated on how thoroughly and concisely your precis articulates the  source’s argument, support, and rhetorical situation. You will also be  evaluated on how well your rhetorical analysis paragraphs evaluate the  article’s effectiveness in using, ethos, logos, pathos, kairos,  depending on its rhetorical situation (audience, author, purpose and  context). Good analytical paragraphs include  SPECIFIC moments from your article, using direct quotations and  references as appropriate. Make sure you link your evaluations  explicitly to the rhetorical appeals which they involve. Extra MLA citations: Rhetorical Precis Template: Sample Precis: For  this assignment, “source” can be interpreted very broadly. You might  choose a blog entry, a BuzzFeed article, or even a Tweet or Facebook  post. However, the less complex a source or a voice is, the more complex  I expect your analysis of it.

Do you need us to help you on this or any other assignment?


Make an Order Now